Government  Health IT
TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Cloud Computing
    • Election 2012
    • Electronic Health Record
    • ePrescribing
    • Health Information Exchange (HIE)
    • Meaningful Use
    • Medicaid
    • Medicare
    • Military Health
    • Mobile/ Wireless
    • NHIN
    • Policy & Legislation
    • Population Health
    • Privacy and Security
    • Quality and Safety
    • Telehealth
    • Workforce Management
  • Issues
    • Sept/Oct 2011
    • July/August 2011
    • May/June 2011
    • March/April 2011
    • Jan/Feb 2011
    • Nov/Dec 2010
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • On Demand Webinars
  • White Papers
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • RSS
  • Slideshows
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletters
  • Advertise
  • LOGIN
  • REGISTER
  • SUBSCRIBE
Home » Blogs » Electronic Health Record | Meaningful Use

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • RSS Icon
  

Tweet

EMR implementation: Efficiency vs. incentives

September 26, 2011 | Paul Winandy

Related Resources

  • Proactive Security and Privacy Monitoring for Modern Healthcare Networks
  • Transforming Health Care Information Management with Data Capture Technologies
  • HIE Interoperability case study: Health-e-cITi-NJ
  • Best Practices to Deploy ECM Technologies: Ensure Decisions are Made Based on all the Information, not a Portion of it
  • Your Cloud in Healthcare - How to Use the Cloud to Achieve Greater Business Agility
Government incentives have made EMR implementation a hot topic for many medical practitioners. Everyone loves getting money back from the government, but don’t let the incentive money push you into a decision you will regret.
For any practice still using paper, the sales pitch is enticing. Integrate your operations! Go paperless! Improve profitability! Combine this with the government incentives, and the motivation to sign up is pretty compelling.
Unfortunately, the hype doesn’t match reality for many of these EMR implementations. For example:
  • EMR implementation and use can be so daunting that some have quit practicing medicine over it.
  • Only 11 percent of all customers for a leading EMR have achieved “meaningful use,” qualifying them for the federal incentives.
  • A recent study reported two disappointing statistics: (1) 31 percent of practitioners reported their productivity decreased after implementing an EMR and 43 percent reported no improvement in productivity; 38 percent reported that total practice costs increased after implementing an EMR and 36 percent reported costs stayed the same.
Nearly 75 percent of practices reported no tangible benefits from implementing an EMR. And about one-third of the practices had costs go up and productivity decrease for the most important people in the practice. No matter what kind of incentive you receive from the government, that math just doesn’t add up. Why would you buy software that may earn you a rebate in the short term, but actually causes you to see fewer patients and costs your practice money in the long term?
Part of the answer is that most EMR packages were originally designed to improve front-office efficiency by scheduling appointments faster, storing documents efficiently, and integrating with billing. A good EMR system will have any front-office staff grinning from ear to ear because of all the ways it makes their job easier. But frankly, who cares? It’s nice to make your front-office staff happy, but it doesn’t really save you money. You will likely keep the same number of staff working the same number of hours.
The truth is that the only determining business factor that should be considered in selecting an EMR system is whether or not it improves the practitioners’ productivity or tangibly reduces costs. Making the practitioners more efficient is what shows up on the bottom line, through increasing patient visits, improving patient care and/or providing more free time to grow the business.
Practitioners need to revamp their thinking when it comes to purchasing an EMR system. Here are some ideas to put into play:
Get involved. Don’t delegate the EMR assessment and decision-making to your office administrator. Demo packages firsthand and evaluate how each will impact your workflow, documentation time and day-to-day practices. This is a big decision that will impact your practice for a long time, so invest the time to make an informed decision.
Talk to your peers. Find out the good, the bad and the ugly on each of the systems you are evaluating. Get references from the EMR vendor, but find others through your peer network.
Focus on your efficiency, not your front office. Will you be able to complete your notes faster? Will you be able to see more patients? Will the EMR allow you to have more face-time with your patients? Will it help you improve patient care?
Ask about training time. If the system takes two weeks of training time to learn and months more to master, then it is way too complex. Are you really going to be able to invest that time to become proficient? An intuitive software system allows you to learn it fast, with little instruction, and be productive in short order. 
Do your homework. Ask all the right questions before you buy. Keep in mind that the costs to switch to a different system are very high. There are some nice buying guides available for free to help guide your questions to the vendor.
A great example comes out of the therapy industry. Therapy clinics do not qualify to receive government incentives for EMR adoption, yet they are signing up for EMR systems in droves. Why go through the pain and cost of implementation if you don’t have an incentive driving the decision? Simple, the EMR solutions available to therapists deliver economic benefits. These solutions match their workflow and are tailored to their specialty, saving dozens of hours a month that used to be spent on documentation and other practice management activities. Those hours are going right back into the practice, allowing for additional patient visits, more marketing time and improved patient care. 
The bottom line is that an EMR system should make you efficient, improve patient care and save you money. If it doesn’t you should part ways with your vendor and try again.
Paul Winandy is CEO of WebPT. He can be reached at paulw@webpt.com. This post appeared at EHRWatch.com.
Related Topics:
  • Electronic Health Record
  • Meaningful Use
  • WebPT
  • paulw@webpt.com
  • Person Career
  • Person Email Address
  • Paul Winandy

Reader Comments (0)Login to Post a Comment

Most Popular

Latest Headlines
Most Popular
  • Why modernizing state IT infrastructures is crucial for HIX
  • Report: HIT market will swell to $56B by 2017
  • OIG lets state Medicaid fraud units use federal funds for analytics
  • $1M grant bringing HIE to rural CA providers
  • Hagel says DoD to adopt commerical EHR
  • Is the presidential election healthcare's own perfect storm for EHRs?
  • Stage 2 meaningful use: Patient engagement and HIE
  • Doctors Using Electronic Health Records Provide Higher Quality Healthcare
  • Impacts of ACA and Massachusetts law still to be measured; some see costs falling
  • Why health execs don't understand the ROI of HIT
more Blog

WEBINARS AND WHITE PAPERS

  • WHITE PAPERS
    Key Benefits to a Secure & Elastic Private Cloud
  • WHITE PAPERS
    Cloud Computing in the Healthcare Environment
  • WHITE PAPERS
    New World Order: Effectively Securing Healthcare Data Through Secure Information Exchanges
  • WHITE PAPERS
    Your Cloud in Healthcare - How to Use the Cloud to Achieve Greater Business Agility
  • WHITE PAPERS
    HIE Interoperability case study: Health-e-cITi-NJ
More Resources
Syndicate content

HIMSS JOBMINE

  • Director of Clinical Applications - MidMichigan Health - Midland, MI
  • Information Services Director - Central Peninsula Hospital - Soldotna, AK
  • Director, Marketing and Business Development - Vermont Information Technology Leaders, Inc. - Burlington, VT
  • CIO - Bend Memorial Clinic - Bend, Oregon
  • Director of Clinical Transformation - Agnesian Healthcare - Fond du Lac, WI
more jobs
receive news by email

Marketplace

  • Home
  • Resource Central
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Mobile Site
  • Advertise
  • RSS
  • About
  • Site map
  • Privacy Policy
Follow Government Health IT on TwitterLike Government Health IT on FacebookJoin Government Health IT on LinkedInRSS Subscriptions
BlogEvents
JobsMobile SiteMobile App
 
Healthcare IT NewsHealthcare Finance NewsHealthcare Payer NewsHIEWatch ICD10Watch mHIMSS PhysBizTech
©2013 MedTech Media Government Health IT is a publication of MedTech Media
Advertise About Us Privacy Policy