Government  Health IT
TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Cloud Computing
    • Election 2012
    • Electronic Health Record
    • ePrescribing
    • Health Information Exchange (HIE)
    • Meaningful Use
    • Medicaid
    • Medicare
    • Military Health
    • Mobile/ Wireless
    • NHIN
    • Policy & Legislation
    • Population Health
    • Privacy and Security
    • Quality and Safety
    • Telehealth
    • Workforce Management
  • Issues
    • Sept/Oct 2011
    • July/August 2011
    • May/June 2011
    • March/April 2011
    • Jan/Feb 2011
    • Nov/Dec 2010
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • On Demand Webinars
  • White Papers
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • RSS
  • Slideshows
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletters
  • Advertise
  • LOGIN
  • REGISTER
  • SUBSCRIBE
Home » News » Electronic Health Record | Health Information Exchange (HIE) | Meaningful Use
Receive News
By Email

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • RSS Icon
  

Tweet

5 reasons EHR functionality hasn't changed since 1982

March 19, 2012 | Timathie Leslie and Megan Doscher and Brynnan Toner, Booz Allen Hamilton

Suggested Content

  • Maine tops states for provider rate of EHRs, meaningful use
  • Q&A: MeHI director looks at Massachusetts' HIE road ahead
  • California Rep. proposes FDA Office of Mobile Health
  • FCC rural healthcare broadband pilots improve care
  • Telemedicine goes 'hi-def'
  • Telemedicine goes 'hi-def'
  • FCC to promote mobile health apps in broadband plan
  • Where a little IT means big savings

Related Resources

  • HIE Interoperability case study: Health-e-cITi-NJ
  • Advanced Text Mining Improves Medicare Advantage Coding
  • Proactive Security and Privacy Monitoring for Modern Healthcare Networks
  • QualSight LASIK Achieves HIPAA Compliance After Attempted Hack
  • Accelerate Healthcare Reform with Information Technology

Electronic health records (EHRs) have traveled on quite a journey since their inception in the 1960s. Powered by the advancement of modern technology, they no longer exist simply on stand-alone terminals – EHRs are now mobile, enabled by mobile broadband, smart phones, and tablets. In recent years, EHR adoption has increased quickly, spurred in part by the federal Meaningful Use Incentive program, bringing promise of vast improvements in healthcare quality, patient safety, workplace efficiencies, and patient empowerment.

Despite this progress, basic EHR functionality remains largely unchanged since 1982, slowing the evolution and integration of new technologies and capabilities, which remain paramount to transforming the healthcare system.

[Commentary: Inside meaningful use stage 2 NPRMs: A difficult balance.]

Recently, the California HealthCare Foundation (CHCF) sought to understand the next-generation EHR landscape and promises for the future. On behalf of CHCF, Booz Allen Hamilton conducted interviews with an array of industry experts across multiple disciplines – from providers to payors and informatics experts.

To understand the current and future environment, we started by examining the history of EHRs. From research and interviews, we found several issues that had contributed to slowing the evolution of EHRs:

  1. Initial Focus on Coding, Billing, and Documentation: Vendors designed EHRs originally to ensure payment. Many had few incentives to enable EHRs to improve the quality and efficiency of care. Most cite this initial focus as a significant roadblock for true EHR innovation.
  2. Complexity of Healthcare: It is challenging for EHRs to facilitate clinical decision-making while remaining user-friendly for physicians.
  3. Limited Focus on Information Exchange: The majority of EHRs operate on closed networks that do not easily connect with other systems. Vendors have few incentives to open up these closed systems, but a freer flow of information and data can have a powerful effect on care coordination and delivery.
  4. Fee-For-Service Payment Structures: EHRs operate within the confines of the current system, where coding structures and patient visit volume still determine payment.
  5. Prohibitive Costs: EHR implementation remains financially out of reach for some providers, especially small practices that tend to operate on slim margins.

The Meaningful Use Incentive program, however, initiated as part of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, has created a "tipping point" for EHR adoption, by lowering the financial barriers and raising the bar on expectations for functionality to support high quality care. Providers are now less likely to wonder why they should implement an EHR, and are more likely to consider how they will adopt this technology in the next few years.

Challenges remain – usability, implementation costs, and interoperability – but consensus shows EHRs are poised for significant change. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) signaled a shift toward delivery models – patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) and Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) – that reward quality of care, not volume. Additionally, new investments in integrated analytics for clinical data, health information exchange (HIE), and patient communication technologies will help deliver the next-generation EHRs.

These next-generation EHRs hold enormous promise, playing a large role in helping to provide high quality, low-cost care. While experts might disagree on which forces – government versus private, free market – should drive EHR development, four themes emerged on the future of EHRs in the next few years:

  1. Further integration with mobile technologies;
  2. Greater affordability and personalization for providers;
  3. More accessibility and interoperability with other systems; and
  4. Greater emphasis on patient centeredness to encourage patient engagement in care decisions and communication with providers.

Experts will continue to debate current policies and programs to spur EHR innovation and adoption, and the proper role and responsibilities for government and private industry. However, our research showed consensus that EHRs are poised for significant change in the coming decade, as technology evolves and the healthcare system reforms. We agree – the more effective use of EHRs has the potential to transform every aspect of healthcare in the United States.

The full report, titled “What's Ahead for EHRs: Experts Weigh In,” is available on the California Healthcare Foundation's Web site.
 

Related Topics:
  • Online Only
  • Electronic Health Record
  • Health Information Exchange (HIE)
  • Meaningful Use
  • Booz Allen
  • United States
  • healthcare
  • Broadband
  • California
  • information technology
  • smart phones

Reader Comments (1)Login to Post a Comment

strawdog says: EHR Comments
March 20, 2012 | 10:57AM GMT
I am always impressed with experts. I think these folks are not noticing the elephant in the room. these 5 reasons for EHR's not changing are the same 5 reasons that CMS is not changing. The data collected by the Feds are wholly corrupted, the Fraud Waste and Abuse phenomena is so bad that expenditures could be 1/2 of what public healthcare costs today, or last year or the year before. Has anyone noticed that RAC recoveries are twice what the were in 2010 vs 2011? Why is that? Has CMS made twice as many duplicate payments? NO! Duplicate payments are at least $10Billion per year and the pressure is on to correct this item of flagrancy. This does not even begin to scratch the surface and RAC system costs US $700,000,000 per year! I think the experts need to wake up to the truth of the PriceWaterhouse and Reuters Reports of 2009, as well as FBI testimony to Congress. Defrauding the Federal Government in Public Healthcare is more lucrative than illegal drug trafficing! Further, the Fraud is so big, that other governments around the world can get more money by defrauding healthcare than they can in legitimate foreign aide. The republicans and democrats need to similarly come to terms with the REAL issues. It is not ACA that matters. It is official denial, or maybe plausable denial, at a hemorraging of $400-$600,000,000,000 (yes, hundreds of billions of dollars) per year in cost that has absolutely nothing to do with any of the practitioners of health care in the United States. But it is only the good guys that the Feds seem to want to audit to death.

Most Popular

Latest Headlines
Most Popular
  • Why modernizing state IT infrastructures is crucial for HIX
  • Report: HIT market will swell to $56B by 2017
  • OIG lets state Medicaid fraud units use federal funds for analytics
  • Hagel says DoD to adopt commerical EHR
  • $1M grant bringing HIE to rural CA providers
  • 10 health reform benefits at risk in the election
  • Would Romney kill meaningful use?
  • CMS circulates final 2014 MU clinical quality measures
  • HIE is critical public utility in Sandy disaster
  • HIMSS: The intangibles of HIT employee retention
more news

WEBINARS AND WHITE PAPERS

  • WHITE PAPERS
    Cloud Computing in the Healthcare Environment
  • WHITE PAPERS
    When Evolution Drives Revolution: The Cloud as a Business Model
  • WHITE PAPERS
    The First Federal Private Cloud: Learn to Shape, Transform & Manage Applications
  • WHITE PAPERS
    HIE Interoperability case study: Health-e-cITi-NJ
  • WHITE PAPERS
    Beyond the EHR: Seamlessly Connecting Nurses and Physicians Using an EHR-Extender (EHR-e)
More Resources
Syndicate content

HIMSS JOBMINE

  • Director of Clinical Applications - MidMichigan Health - Midland, MI
  • Information Services Director - Central Peninsula Hospital - Soldotna, AK
  • Director, Marketing and Business Development - Vermont Information Technology Leaders, Inc. - Burlington, VT
  • CIO - Bend Memorial Clinic - Bend, Oregon
  • Director of Clinical Transformation - Agnesian Healthcare - Fond du Lac, WI
more jobs
receive news by email

Marketplace

  • Home
  • Resource Central
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Mobile Site
  • Advertise
  • RSS
  • About
  • Site map
  • Privacy Policy
Follow Government Health IT on TwitterLike Government Health IT on FacebookJoin Government Health IT on LinkedInRSS Subscriptions
BlogEvents
JobsMobile SiteMobile App
 
Healthcare IT NewsHealthcare Finance NewsHealthcare Payer NewsHIEWatch ICD10Watch mHIMSS PhysBizTech
©2013 MedTech Media Government Health IT is a publication of MedTech Media
Advertise About Us Privacy Policy