- What avoiding the fiscal cliff might mean to Medicare
- Top lobbyists prep for Supreme Court healthcare decision
- Will health IT bipartisanship survive the elections?
- HIMSS EHR Association fires back at GOP Senators calling for MU reboot
- Arizona GOP Senators split, pass Medicaid expansion
- GOP raises concerns about Sebelius, IRS
- Sen. Baucus says ACA to be 'appreciated down the road'
- Pa. Gov names new health secretary
- Governors weigh HIX options
- New World Order: Effectively Securing Healthcare Data Through Secure Information Exchanges
- Are You Truly ACA Compliant? Incorporating the Correct Public Records Data Into Your Workflow
- The Power of User Virtualization: Meeting Meaningful Use, Optimizing IT and Clinical Productivity
- Delivering the Future of Healthcare: Maintain Compliance, Improve Efficiency and Continuity of Care...Virtually Anywhere
- Managed Care for Medicaid - Assess, Implement, and Administer
A former GOP power player is urging Republicans to rethink their rejection of the health law and to implement state insurance exchanges – and to do it now.
Bill Frist, a former Republican Senate majority leader and heart transplant surgeon,
that state officials should not pass up the opportunity to build the insurance exchanges that are right for them. (Under the law, if a state that doesn’t create its own exchange, the federal government will parachute in to do the job).
“Originally a Republican idea, the state insurance exchanges mandated under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will offer a menu of private insurance plans to pick and choose from, all with a required set of minimum benefits, to those without employer-sponsored health insurance,” wrote Frist, who is also a member of The Kaiser Family Foundation board. (KHN is an editorially independent project of the foundation.) “These exchanges are expected to bring health insurance to an additional 16 million Americans. Unlike the Medicaid expansion, these Americans will gain private insurance, and can choose the plan that’s right for them.”
Fifteen states have taken the first steps to set up exchanges, basically online insurance marketplaces. The health law has received withering criticism from many Republican governors, and some have refused to establish exchanges. Some were waiting for a decision on the law from the Supreme Court, and are now moving forward. Still others are holding out hope that Republicans will win big in November and repeal the entire law.
But Frist, who isn’t a fan of the law’s insurance mandate, believes state-based exchanges are a good idea.
[Political Malpractice: Are politics extinguishing state insurance exchanges?]
“State exchanges are the solution,” he wrote. “They represent the federalist ideal of states as ‘laboratories for democracy.’ We are seeing 50 states each designing a model that is right for them, empowered to take into account their individual cultures, politics, economies, and demographics. While much planning has yet to be done, we are already seeing a huge range in state models. I love the diversity and the innovation.”
This article was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.