- Medicare Strike Force nails 89 fraudsters
- Expert predicts 'meaningful use fatigue' in 2015
- 3 lessons on risk: What higher ed can teach health IT
- Q&A: An ONC HIT Workforce Development Program success story
- HHS gives LyfeChannel mobile app award
- Link between breaches and fraud on the rise
- Data prize series to solve 'most daunting' healthcare problems
- Senate committee hears benefits, costs of insurance reforms
The U.S. healthcare system has long been laden with growing inefficiencies, heightened costs and increasing complexities, all which have stymied industry progress, according to a new Institute of Medicine (IOM) report.
However, report officials also noted existing knowledge, transparency, and new informatics tools wield the potential to mend the – some say broken – healthcare system to achieve continuous improvement and better quality care at lower costs.
In a Thursday morning live webcast of the IOM report release, Mark Smith, MD, president and CEO of California HealthCare Foundation and committee chair said two fundamental issues are currently facing the U.S. healthcare system: cost and complexity. Thus the mission of the report was “to find the foundational characteristics of a system that is efficient,” said Smith.
[Survey analysis: Romneycare vs. Obamacare, do Americans care?]
According to the report, the costs of the system's current inefficiencies underscore the urgent need for a system-wide transformation. The committee calculated that approximately 30 percent of health spending in 2009 – roughly $750 billion – was wasted on unnecessary services, excessive administrative costs, fraud and other problems.
The U.S. pays some of the highest costs for healthcare, but “at the same time, we do not attain the results in health outcomes and performances that others are able to achieve," said IOM President Harvey Feinburg, MD, in the live webcast. “How do we face up to that reality?”
Smith added that a “30 percent increase in income has been effectively eliminated by a 76 percent increase in healthcare costs,” leaving the U.S. healthcare system full of “wasted opportunity.”
Moreover, inefficiencies can potentially lead to patient suffering. By one estimate, roughly 75,000 deaths might have been averted in 2005 if every state had delivered care at the quality level of the best performing state.
Incremental upgrades and changes by individual hospitals or providers will not suffice, the committee said. Achieving higher quality care at lower cost will require an across-the-board commitment to transform the U.S. health system into a "learning" system that continuously improves by systematically capturing and broadly disseminating lessons from every care experience and new research discovery.
Report officials point to the necessity of embracing new technologies to collect and tap clinical data at the point of care, engaging patients and their families as partners, and establishing greater teamwork and transparency within health care organizations. Moreover, incentives and payment systems should emphasize the value and outcomes of care, not the number of services provided.
[See also: IOM recommends 'gold standard' for clinical practice .]
"The threats to Americans' health and economic security are clear and compelling, and it's time to get all hands on deck," said Smith. "Our healthcare system lags in its ability to adapt, affordably meet patients' needs, and consistently achieve better outcomes. But we have the know-how and technology to make substantial improvement on costs and quality. Our report offers the vision and road map to create a learning health care system that will provide higher quality and greater value."
The ways that healthcare providers currently train, practice, and learn new information cannot keep pace with the flood of research discoveries and technological advances, the report says. How healthcare organizations approach care delivery and how providers are paid for their services also often lead to inefficiencies and lower effectiveness and may hinder improvement.
Smith adds: “There are four new tools at our disposal that were not at our disposal 12 years ago.” He lists computing (a power that is “ubiquitous and affordable”), connectivity, improvements in organizational capabilities, and teamwork and collaboration between clinicians and patients.
Better use of data is a critical element of a continuously improving health system, the report says. About 75 million Americans have more than one chronic condition, requiring coordination among multiple specialists and therapies, which can increase the potential for miscommunication, misdiagnosis, potentially conflicting interventions, and dangerous drug interactions.
Moreover, health professionals and patients frequently lack relevant and useful information at the point of care where decisions are made. And it can take years for new breakthroughs to gain widespread adoption; for example, the report cites the 13 years it took for the use of beta blockers to become standard practice after they were shown to improve survival rates for heart attack victims.
Mobile technologies and electronic health records offer significant potential to capture and share health data better. The National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, IT developers, and standard-setting organizations should ensure that these systems are robust and interoperable, the report says. Clinicians and care organizations should fully adopt these technologies, and patients should be encouraged to use tools, such as personal health information portals, to actively engage in their care.
Healthcare costs have increased at a greater rate than the economy as a whole for 31 of the past 40 years. Most payment systems emphasize volume over quality and value by reimbursing providers for individual procedures and tests rather than paying a flat rate or reimbursing based on patients' outcomes, the report notes. It calls on health economists, researchers, professional societies, and insurance providers to work together on ways to measure quality performance and design new payment models and incentives that reward high-value care.
[See also: IOM calls for sweeping efforts on patient safety.]
Although engaging patients and their families in care decisions and management of their conditions leads to better outcomes and can reduce costs, such participation remains limited, the committee found. To facilitate these interactions, health care organizations should embrace new tools to gather and assess patients' perspectives and use the information to improve delivery of care. Health care product developers should create tools that assist people in managing their health and communicating with their providers.
Increased transparency about the costs and outcomes of care also boosts opportunities to learn and improve and should be a hallmark of institutions' organizational cultures, the committee said. Linking providers' performance to patient outcomes and measuring performance against internal and external benchmarks allows organizations to enhance their quality and become better stewards of limited resources, the report says. In addition, managers should ensure that their institutions foster teamwork, staff empowerment, and open communication.
The report was sponsored by the Blue Shield of California Foundation, Charina Endowment Fund, and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.