Is there a civil war already underway between healthcare industry associations? And why hasn't the federal government properly assessed if ICD-10 is even sustainable for all but the largest providers?
Shortly after the National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS) recommended that the United States adopt ICD-10, the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) assembled a session on the code scheme for its annual conference. The last-minute addition was so late, in fact, that the MGMA did not have time to include it on the printed agenda, and the only available time slot was 7 a.m.
Romney says ACA repeal could help budget, the opportunity within the EHR upcoding controversy, ICD-10 on the cheap, Northern Ireland, results of a reader poll about health IT in the GOP and Democratic party platforms, and more.
MGMA senior policy adviser Robert Tennant, speaking at the group's annual conference, shares his tactics for embarking on the ICD-10 road on the cheap, at least for now.
Usability, perhaps now more than ever, is one of the most significant challenges physicians grapple with when choosing and learning an EHR. Here's a look at some of the most pertinent usability aspects.
A seemingly smaller but inevitably important milestone – HIPAA 5010 – stands between healthcare entities and ICD-10, both on the calendar and in IT back offices. And that deadline promises to measure the industry’s progress, or lack thereof, toward the forthcoming code sets.
According to a recent Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) 45.2 percent of responding physician practices said they had not started HIPAA 5010 implementation.
The advisory committee's intent would create more time for implementing the mandated code sets – but holding out for the final rule stands to make ICD-10 even more excruciating.